Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.2 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2021-09-24 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 8.47 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1099.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2778 x 1284 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 10.71 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max has an overall score of 93.2, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy A50s's overall score of 86.6. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max's construction has the same thickness than Galaxy A50s, but it is incredibly heavier. Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max counts with iOS 15.x operating system, and Galaxy A50s works with Android 10 operating system.
IPhone 13 Pro Max counts with a greater processing power than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although faster), and they both have the same RAM memory amount, the iPhone 13 Pro Max also counts with a 64-bits processor. IPhone 13 Pro Max has a slightly better display than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because it has a better resolution of 1284 x 2778px, a little greater display pixels density and a little bit larger display.
Galaxy A50s shoots much clearer pictures and videos than iPhone 13 Pro Max, because although it has lower video frame rate and a much smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A50s also counts with a camera with lot more megapixels. Samsung Galaxy A50s features a very superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A50s also has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 512 GB.
Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max features just a bit longer battery life than Galaxy A50s, because it has 4352mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.