Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.2 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-09-24 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.33 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 8.47 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2778 x 1284 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 10.71 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4352mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 13 Pro Max has a general score of 93.2, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G's 92.3 global score. IPhone 13 Pro Max works with iOS 15.x operating system, while Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G works with Android 11 operating system. Even though the iPhone 13 Pro Max is newer than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, it's a little thicker and a lot heavier.
The iPhone 13 Pro Max features a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have a display of the same size, the iPhone 13 Pro Max also has a quite greater pixels density and a bit higher 1284 x 2778 resolution. The iPhone 13 Pro Max features a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and lesser cpu cores , it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G has a slightly better camera than iPhone 13 Pro Max, although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for shooting photos and/or video in poorly lited environments, they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rate, the same resolution back facing camera and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G features a very superior memory capacity for applications and games than iPhone 13 Pro Max, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max has improved battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 32% more battery size.
Although iPhone 13 Pro Max is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy Z Flip 5G. If you are trying to save some money, you can get Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and give up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.