Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.3 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| iOS 15.x | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2021-09-24 | 2018-08-16 |
| 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.20 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver | 16 777 216 |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 999.00 | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 10.71 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.04 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro is way better than Motorola Moto Z3, with a global score of 93.3 against 77.6. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro works with iOS 15.x OS, and Motorola Moto Z3 works with Android 9.0 Pie OS. Apple iPhone 13 Pro's design is noticeably newer, but much heavier and just a little bit thicker than the Motorola Moto Z3.
The iPhone 13 Pro counts with a better processing power than Moto Z3, because although it has 2 lesser cpu cores , it also counts with a greater amount of RAM memory and a 64 bits processor. IPhone 13 Pro has a brighter screen than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has a quite bigger display, a bit higher 1170 x 2532 pixels resolution and a quite better pixel density.
Apple iPhone 13 Pro captures slightly better videos and photos than Moto Z3, and although they both have a 12 MP resolution camera in the back and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Apple iPhone 13 Pro also has a much larger aperture and better video frame rates. The Moto Z3 counts with a superior storage capacity for games and applications than iPhone 13 Pro, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
IPhone 13 Pro has just a little better battery life than Motorola Moto Z3, because it has a 3% greater battery size.
Although Apple iPhone 13 Pro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Moto Z3, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto Z3. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get Moto Z3, and give up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.