Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.3 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x | -- |
| 2021-09-24 | 2021-03-17 |
| 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 7.20 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver | -- |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 999.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 10.71 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.04 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro has a global score of 93.3, which is a little bit better than Galaxy A52's overall score of 90.7. Although the Apple iPhone 13 Pro and the Galaxy A52 were released only 6 months apart, the Apple iPhone 13 Pro body is just a little heavier but also a little bit thinner. The iPhone 13 Pro features a quite superior hardware performance than Galaxy A52, because although it has less cores , and they both have the same RAM memory amount, the iPhone 13 Pro also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
Apple iPhone 13 Pro counts with a better display than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better 1170 x 2532 pixels resolution and a little better display pixels density. The Galaxy A52 has a much greater storage for applications and games than iPhone 13 Pro, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A52 also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
Galaxy A52 counts with a superior battery performance than Apple iPhone 13 Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3095mAh. Galaxy A52 features a greater camera than Apple iPhone 13 Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not good for capturing images in poorly lited situations and worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A52 also counts with a back camera with much more mega pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.