Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 93.3 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x | -- |
| 2021-09-24 | 2016-03-11 |
| 5.78 x 2.81 x 0.30 inches | 5.61 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.20 ounces | 5.36 ounces |
| Gold, Graphite, Sierra Blue and Silver | Black, Gold, Pink, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 999.00 | $ 124.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2532 x 1170 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 457 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | 855 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A15 Bionic (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3240 MHz processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 10.71 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3095mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.04 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 13 Pro has a general score of 93.3, which is better than the Galaxy S7's score of 79.5. The Apple iPhone 13 Pro construction is noticeably newer and a bit thinner, but also extremely heavier than the Galaxy S7. The iPhone 13 Pro has a quite superior performance than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has a 64-bit CPU, a higher number of cores (and they are faster) and 2 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy S7 counts with a bit sharper screen than iPhone 13 Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen and much worse brightness, it also counts with a quite better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a better pixels amount per inch in the display. The iPhone 13 Pro shoots clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy S7, and although they both have the same (4K) video quality and a back facing camera with a 12 mega pixels, the iPhone 13 Pro also has faster 60 fps video frame rate and a larger diafragm aperture to take better photos in poorly lited environments.
IPhone 13 Pro counts with a better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S7, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal memory. The iPhone 13 Pro counts with just a bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S7, because it has a 3095mAh battery capacity.
Although Apple iPhone 13 Pro is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Galaxy S7, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy S7. If you prefer to save some dollars, you can buy Galaxy S7, and give up a couple features, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.