Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 94.9 | 92.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 16.x | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-09-16 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.33 x 3.05 x 0.31 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 8.47 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Deep Purple, Gold, Silver and Space Black | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2796 x 1290 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 460 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple 16 Bionic (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| 64-bit Hexa-Core 3460 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple GPU 5-core GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 10.8 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.33 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4323mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.24 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 14 Pro Max has a general score of 94.9, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy Z Flip 5G's score of 92.3. Although the iPhone 14 Pro Max is extremely newer than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, it's a little thicker and incredibly heavier. The iPhone 14 Pro Max works with iOS 16.x OS, while Galaxy Z Flip 5G has Android 11 OS.
Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max features a better processor than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because although it has 2 GB less RAM and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64-bit processor. The iPhone 14 Pro Max counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have a display with the same size, the iPhone 14 Pro Max also has a little bit better count of pixels per display inch and a slightly better 1290 x 2796 pixels resolution.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a lot bigger storage for apps and games than iPhone 14 Pro Max, because it has 128 GB more internal storage. The Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max shoots better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have the same video frame rates, the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same camera aperture, the Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max also has a way higher 48 megapixels resolution camera.
The Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max has improved battery duration than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a 4323mAh battery size.
Although Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max is a better device, it is way more expensive than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Galaxy Z Flip 5G. If you want to save some money, you can buy the Galaxy Z Flip 5G, giving up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.