Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2016-09-16 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.23 x 3.07 x 0.29 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Jet black, Red, Rose gold and Silver | Black and White |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 969.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A10 Fusion APL1W24 (16 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit (Quad-Core 2340 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| PowerVR 7XT GT7600 Plus GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2900mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.88 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 7 Plus is a little bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, having a score of 83.8 against 77.8. Apple iPhone 7 Plus is a way older and noticeably thicker phone than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, but Apple was able to make it somewhat lighter anyway. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much sharper screen than Apple iPhone 7 Plus, because it has a way brighter display, a much larger display, a bit better screen pixel density and a way better 2200 x 2480 resolution.
The Apple iPhone 7 Plus features a much better performing processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM and less CPU cores. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a superior memory to store more games and applications than iPhone 7 Plus, because it has more internal memory capacity.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro takes way better photos and videos than iPhone 7 Plus, because it has a much larger back camera sensor which provides a lot better photo and video quality, a back facing camera with way more megapixels, a larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light photos and a lot higher video definition.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much longer battery duration than Apple iPhone 7 Plus, because it has 5700mAh of battery capacity instead of 2900mAh.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Apple iPhone 7 Plus is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.