Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.6 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-09-16 | 2020-01-31 |
| 5.44 x 2.64 x 0.28 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 4.87 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Gold, Jet black, Red, Rose gold and Silver | Black |
| Aluminum | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 849.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1334 x 750 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 326 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A10 Fusion APL1W24 (16 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| 64-bit (Quad-Core 2340 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR 7XT GT7600 Plus GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.18 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1960mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 3.84 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 7 is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, getting a general score of 81.6 against 81. Even though the Apple iPhone 7 is notably older than the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, it's design is much thinner and extremely lighter. IPhone 7 and Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro both have quite similar screens, although the Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro also has a higher pixel quantity in each screen inch, a way larger screen and a way higher 1080 x 2340 resolution.
IPhone 7 features a quite bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a little faster CPU than iPhone 7, because it has 2 GB more RAM memory and a higher number of cores.
The Galaxy XCover Pro has a slightly better camera than Apple iPhone 7, because although it has a much tinier sensor taking less light and washed colors, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the Galaxy XCover Pro also counts with a camera with way more megapixels and a larger diafragm aperture for better low light captures and video.
Galaxy XCover Pro has a really longer battery performance than Apple iPhone 7, because it has a 107% more battery size.
Although Apple iPhone 7 is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Galaxy XCover Pro, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Galaxy XCover Pro. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy the Galaxy XCover Pro, and give up a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.