Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Oppo |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2017-09-22 | 2020-05-21 |
| 6.24 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray | Moonlight Black and Starry Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 949.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2691mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.64 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
Comparison review
The iPhone 8 Plus has a score of 87.1, which is much better than the OPPO Find X2 Neo's global score of 77.7. IPhone 8 Plus's body has the same thickness than OPPO Find X2 Neo, but it is somewhat heavier. OPPO Find X2 Neo has a little more vivid display than iPhone 8 Plus, because it has a bigger display, more brightness, a bit higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution and a just a little higher screen pixels density.
The Apple iPhone 8 Plus counts with a bit better hardware performance than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because although it has less RAM and a lower number of cores and slower, it also counts with a 64 bits processing unit. The OPPO Find X2 Neo features a much better camera than Apple iPhone 8 Plus, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also counts with a back facing camera with a lot better resolution, a way bigger back camera sensor capturing lot better quality photographs and a larger camera aperture to capture better photography in low-light situations.
The Apple iPhone 8 Plus and the OPPO Find X2 Neo have very similar storage for games and applications, they have the same internal storage capacity. The OPPO Find X2 Neo has a much longer battery lifetime than iPhone 8 Plus, because it has a 4025mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.