Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 87.1 | 85.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-09-22 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.24 x 3.07 x 0.30 inches | 6.54 x 2.84 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.13 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray | Cream, Lavender and Phantom Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 949.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 401 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.6 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2691mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.64 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 8 Plus has a score of 87.1, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3's global score of 85.6. The iPhone 8 Plus body is extremely older, a little bit heavier and just a little thicker than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3. The iPhone 8 Plus features a little faster CPU than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because although it has a lower number of cores and less RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
Apple iPhone 8 Plus counts with just a bit better screen than Galaxy Z Flip 3, although it has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 1920, a little bit smaller display and a bit lower pixel quantity in each inch in the screen. The iPhone 8 Plus features a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 3. Both of them have a back-facing camera with a 12 MP resolution and the same aperture.
Apple iPhone 8 Plus features a way bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy Z Flip 3, because it has 128 GB more internal memory capacity. Galaxy Z Flip 3 has longer battery lifetime than iPhone 8 Plus, because it has a 23% bigger battery size.
The Apple iPhone 8 Plus not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.