Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-09-22 | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray | Mystic indigo |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 849.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1334 x 750 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 326 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 3.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
IPhone 8 is just a bit better than the Moto G Stylus, with an 85 score against 79.7. Despite of the fact that iPhone 8 is noticeably older than Moto G Stylus, it's construction is way lighter and thinner. The Apple iPhone 8 has a better CPU than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has less cores and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit.
IPhone 8 counts with a bit more vivid screen than Moto G Stylus, although it has a lot lower resolution of 750 x 1334px, a just a bit worse pixels density and a way smaller display. Motorola Moto G Stylus takes much better pictures and videos than iPhone 8, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also counts with a lot larger back-facing camera sensor shooting much higher quality videos and pictures, a lot higher 48 megapixels resolution back facing camera and a bigger diafragm aperture.
Motorola Moto G Stylus has a bit bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Apple iPhone 8, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that allows up to 512 GB. Moto G Stylus features a much better battery performance than iPhone 8, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 1821mAh.
Although Apple iPhone 8 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Moto G Stylus, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Moto G Stylus. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy the Moto G Stylus, and give up a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.