Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2017-09-22 | 2020-06-19 |
| 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 849.00 | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1334 x 750 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 326 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 3.68 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G has an overall score of 91.8, which is a little bit better than iPhone 8's overall score of 85. The Galaxy A71 5G design is way newer than iPhone 8's, although it's a lot heavier and a bit thicker. IPhone 8 has just a little better processing power than Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and 2 lesser and slower processing cores, it also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
The iPhone 8 counts with just a bit better screen than Galaxy A71 5G, although it has a bit worse display density, a really smaller screen and a way lower 750 x 1334px resolution. Galaxy A71 5G counts with a quite bigger storage capacity to install games and applications than iPhone 8, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G takes way better pictures and videos than iPhone 8, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have the same aperture and the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a lot bigger sensor taking lot higher quality photographs and videos and a back facing camera with a much better resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a superior battery performance than iPhone 8, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 1821mAh.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.