Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Vivo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-09-22 | 2021-04-02 |
| 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches | 6.24 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray | Midnight Black and Shimmer Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 849.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1334 x 750 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | AMOLED |
| 326 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 10.08 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4200mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 3.68 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 8 is a bit better than vivo X60 Pro, having a overall score of 85 against 78.8. Apple iPhone 8's construction is just a little bit thinner and lighter than the vivo X60 Pro, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. IPhone 8 has just a little better performance than vivo X60 Pro, because although it has an inferior number of cores and also slower and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
The vivo X60 Pro and iPhone 8 count with incredibly similar displays, although the vivo X60 Pro also has a lot higher resolution of 1080 x 2376 pixels, a little bit higher pixel count in each inch in the display and a way bigger screen. Apple iPhone 8 and vivo X60 Pro feature quite similar storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos, both of them have equal internal memory capacity.
Vivo X60 Pro has a much better battery duration than iPhone 8, because it has 4200mAh of battery capacity. The vivo X60 Pro has a better camera than iPhone 8, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a F1.8 diafragm aperture and the same 60 fps video frame rate, the vivo X60 Pro also has a camera in the back with much more megapixels and a lot larger sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.