Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | HTC |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x | -- |
| 2020-04-24 | 2017-02-21 |
| 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 399.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1334 x 750 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 5 |
| 326 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple-designed 4 core GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 10.35 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 3.68 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone SE (2020) has a score of 81.5, which is just a bit better than HTC U Ultra's overall score of 77. The iPhone SE (2020) is a much newer phone, and it is also just a bit thinner and lighter than the HTC U Ultra. HTC U Ultra has a slightly better screen than iPhone SE (2020), because it has a much better screen density, a way better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a bigger display.
HTC U Ultra counts with a way bigger memory for games and applications than iPhone SE (2020), and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage, the HTC U Ultra also has an external memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. Apple iPhone SE (2020) has a quite superior performance than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits CPU and a greater number of faster cores.
HTC U Ultra features a much better battery duration than iPhone SE (2020), because it has 3000mAh of battery capacity. The Apple iPhone SE (2020) takes just a bit better videos and photos than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a way tinier back-facing camera sensor providing a way lower image quality, and they both have the same resolution camera in the back, a same size aperture and the same video definition, the Apple iPhone SE (2020) also counts with better video frame rates.
The iPhone SE (2020) not only is the best devices in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.