Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 81.5 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| iOS 15.x, 14.x, 13.x | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2020-04-24 | 2020-04-04 |
| 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 5.22 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Black, Red and White | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 399.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 1334 x 750 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 326 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A13 Bionic APL1W85 (7 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| 64-bit Lightning and Thunder, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2650 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple-designed 4 core GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 10.35 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 3.68 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone SE (2020) is slightly better than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, with an 81.5 score against 80.1. IPhone SE (2020)'s design is thinner and notably lighter than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, although they were only released with a few months difference. IPhone SE (2020) works with iOS 15.x operating system, and Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo operating system.
The iPhone SE (2020) counts with a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has lesser and slower cores and lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a 64-bit processor. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit more vivid display than iPhone SE (2020), because it has a much greater pixels density, a much better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a quite larger screen.
The Apple iPhone SE (2020) has a way better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller sensor taking less light and dull colors and a tinier aperture which is not good for shooting pictures and video in poorly lited environments, and they both have a 12 mega-pixels back facing camera, the Apple iPhone SE (2020) also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a superior memory capacity to store more apps and games than iPhone SE (2020), and although they both have the same internal memory, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a superior battery performance than iPhone SE (2020), because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Even being the best phone in our current comparison, the iPhone SE (2020) is also a bargain compared to the other phones, making it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.