Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 76.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | HTC |
| -- | Android, HTC Sense UI |
| 2017-11-03 | 2018-01-17 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Black, Blue and Red |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1149.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 463 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 652 MSM8976 chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 10.17 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3930mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone X is better than HTC U11 EYEs, getting an 88.1 score against 76.9. The iPhone X is a a bit thinner and a little bit lighter device than HTC U11 EYEs, even when both of them were released with only a couple months difference. The iPhone X features a sharper screen than HTC U11 EYEs, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher resolution of 1125 x 2436px and a little better quantity of pixels per inch in the display.
HTC U11 EYEs counts with a quite bigger memory for apps and games than iPhone X, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds up to 1,95 TB. The iPhone X counts with a more powerful processing unit than HTC U11 EYEs, because although it has lesser CPU cores and 1 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit processor.
The Apple iPhone X counts with a little bit better camera than HTC U11 EYEs, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for capturing photos and videos in low-light environments, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same resolution back facing camera, the Apple iPhone X also counts with faster video frame rates.
HTC U11 EYEs has a much better battery lifetime than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 45 percent greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.