Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.1 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Vivo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2017-11-03 | 2021-09-30 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.14 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Silver and Space gray | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1149.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Apple 3-core GPU GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 10.17 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 13.3 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 28.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.72 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone X is better than vivo X70 Pro, having a overall score of 88.1 against 78.3. Apple iPhone X's construction is just a little bit thinner and a little lighter than the vivo X70 Pro, even though it was released 4 years before. IPhone X has just a little better performance than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has an inferior number of cores and also slower and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with a 64 bits processor.
The Apple iPhone X counts with a bit better looking display than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1125 x 2436px and a bit better screen density. Apple iPhone X and vivo X70 Pro feature quite similar storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos, both of them have equal internal memory capacity.
Vivo X70 Pro has a much better battery duration than iPhone X, because it has 4450mAh of battery capacity. The vivo X70 Pro has a better camera than iPhone X, and although they both have the same 60 frames per second video frame rate and the same video quality, the vivo X70 Pro also has a bigger diafragm aperture for better low-light photography and video, a lot larger sensor and a camera in the back with much more megapixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.