Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.5 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2018-09-21 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Black and Blue |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 179.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2688 x 1242 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 456 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.9 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone XS Max is better than the Motorola Droid Turbo, having an 84.5 score against 76.4. Apple iPhone XS Max's design is incredibly newer and incredibly thinner, but also somewhat heavier than the Motorola Droid Turbo. Apple iPhone XS Max counts with a bit better CPU than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processing unit, it also counts with a larger amount of RAM memory, a higher number of cores and a 64-bit CPU.
Motorola Droid Turbo features a little bit better display than iPhone XS Max, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a quite higher screen pixels density and a bit higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels. The iPhone XS Max features just a bit better camera than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has a worse (4K) video resolution and a way less megapixels back facing camera, it also counts with a larger camera aperture.
The Apple iPhone XS Max counts with a lot bigger memory to store more apps and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 32 GB more internal memory. The Motorola Droid Turbo has greater battery duration than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has a 23 percent bigger battery capacity.
Although iPhone XS Max is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola Droid Turbo. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy iPhone XS Max, but if you don't you can save some dollars and buy the Motorola Droid Turbo, giving up some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.