Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.5 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| -- | Android 4.4.4 |
| 2018-09-21 | 2014-10-28 |
| 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Black and Blue |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 135.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2688 x 1242 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 456 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.9 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS Max is slightly better than Motorola DROID Turbo, getting a overall score of 84.5 against 77.9. Although the iPhone XS Max is somewhat heavier than the Motorola DROID Turbo, it's much thinner and also way newer. Motorola DROID Turbo has a little sharper screen than iPhone XS Max, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a bit better pixel amount per inch of display and a bit higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels.
Apple iPhone XS Max has just a bit better processing power than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, it also counts with more RAM, a 64-bits processor and a greater number of cores (but slower). Motorola DROID Turbo's memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos is very similar to the iPhone XS Max one, both of them have exactly the same internal storage capacity.
Motorola DROID Turbo counts with improved battery lifetime than iPhone XS Max, because it has a 3900mAh battery capacity. IPhone XS Max counts with a bit better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has a back facing camera with a way lower resolution and a lower 3840x2160 video resolution, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture.
Although Apple iPhone XS Max is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola DROID Turbo. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy Apple iPhone XS Max, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the Motorola DROID Turbo, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.