Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.5 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-09-21 | 2024-08-08 |
| 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1099.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2688 x 1242 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| OLED | P-OLED |
| 456 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 10.26 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XS Max has an overall score of 84.5, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Edge 50's 81.2 global score. Apple iPhone XS Max's construction is a little thinner than Motorola Edge 50, although it's somewhat heavier and was released 6 years before. The Motorola Edge 50 has a little sharper display than Apple iPhone XS Max, because although it has a quite lower 1220 x 2712 pixels resolution and a little lower pixels density, it also counts with a lot brighter display and a quite larger screen.
IPhone XS Max features a much more powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and 2 lesser processing cores , it also counts with a 64-bits CPU. The Motorola Edge 50 counts with a much better memory capacity to install games and applications than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has 256 GB internal memory.
Motorola Edge 50 takes much clearer photographs and videos than iPhone XS Max, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same aperture and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola Edge 50 also counts with a much more megapixels back camera and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor.
Motorola Edge 50 has a superior battery duration than iPhone XS Max, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3179mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.