Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.5 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2018-09-21 | 2019-06-06 |
| 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.29 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Gray and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2688 x 1242 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | OLED |
| 456 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
IPhone XS Max is a little bit better than Moto Z4, with a overall score of 84.5 against 79.8. The iPhone XS Max is an a little bit thicker and notably heavier phone than the Moto Z4. Apple iPhone XS Max counts with a greater performance than Moto Z4, because although it has less cpu cores , and they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Apple iPhone XS Max also counts with a 64-bits CPU.
The Apple iPhone XS Max features a sharper display than Moto Z4, because it has a quite bigger display, a quite better 1242 x 2688 resolution and a little bit greater amount of pixels in each inch in the screen. The Motorola Moto Z4 has a much greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Motorola Moto Z4 shoots much clearer videos and photos than iPhone XS Max, because although it has slower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola Moto Z4 also counts with a much more mega-pixels back facing camera, a bigger camera aperture and a way bigger back camera sensor.
Moto Z4 counts with a little better battery life than iPhone XS Max, because it has 3600mAh of battery capacity.
Although Apple iPhone XS Max is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Moto Z4, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Moto Z4. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy Apple iPhone XS Max, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the Moto Z4, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.