Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.5 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android |
| 2018-09-21 | 2021-01-22 |
| 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1099.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2688 x 1242 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| OLED | TFT |
| 456 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A32 is a little bit better than Apple iPhone XS Max, getting a overall score of 84.7 against 84.5. The Samsung Galaxy A32 is a newer and a little bit lighter phone than the Apple iPhone XS Max, but it's also somewhat thicker. IPhone XS Max has a quite superior processing power than Galaxy A32, because although it has a lower number of cores (but faster), and they both have the same RAM amount, the iPhone XS Max also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
Apple iPhone XS Max has a much more vibrant screen than Samsung Galaxy A32, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Apple iPhone XS Max also has a much better 1242 x 2688 resolution and a way better pixel amount per display inch. The Samsung Galaxy A32 features a very superior storage to install applications and games than Apple iPhone XS Max, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1 TB.
Samsung Galaxy A32 takes slightly better pictures and videos than Apple iPhone XS Max, because although it has worse video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality and a F1.8 camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also counts with a much more MP camera in the back. Galaxy A32 features a very superior battery performance than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3179mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.