Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.5 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-09-21 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2688 x 1242 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 456 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A71 5G has an overall score of 91.8, which is slightly better than iPhone XS Max's global score of 84.5. The Galaxy A71 5G construction is newer and lighter, but also a little bit thicker than iPhone XS Max. The Apple iPhone XS Max counts with a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit higher pixel quantity per inch in the screen and a bit higher 1242 x 2688 pixels resolution.
Apple iPhone XS Max counts with just a bit better processing power than Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has less RAM memory and a lower number of cores , it also counts with a 64 bits CPU. Galaxy A71 5G has a very superior camera than iPhone XS Max, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rate, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a same size aperture, the Galaxy A71 5G also counts with a way larger camera sensor which gives a lot better image and video quality and a lot more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
Galaxy A71 5G features a lot bigger storage to store more apps and games than iPhone XS Max, because it has an external SD slot that admits up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. Samsung Galaxy A71 5G counts with a superior battery lifetime than iPhone XS Max, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone in this comparison, Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is also a bargain compared to others, making this phone a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.