Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.5 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Samsung |
| -- | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2018-09-21 | 2017-02-24 |
| 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Black and Gold |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1099.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 6 inches |
| 2688 x 1242 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| OLED | Super AMOLED |
| 456 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS Max has an overall score of 84.5, which is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro's 81 general score. IPhone XS Max's design is newer, but just a little bit thicker and a bit heavier than the Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro. The iPhone XS Max has a more vivid display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because it has a just a little greater amount of pixels per screen inch, a better 1242 x 2688 resolution and a little bit bigger screen.
The Galaxy C9 Pro has a superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than iPhone XS Max, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory, the Galaxy C9 Pro also has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 256 GB. The iPhone XS Max counts with a faster processing unit than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a lower number of cores (although they are faster) and less RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro features better battery duration than iPhone XS Max, because it has a 26 percent greater battery capacity. IPhone XS Max has a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a back camera with a lot worse resolution, it also counts with a way higher video quality and a larger aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.