Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.5 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2018-09-21 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 7.34 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Black and White |
| Glass and Stainless steel | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1099.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 8 inches |
| 2688 x 1242 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 456 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 10.26 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.2 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS Max is a bit better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, with a general score of 84.5 against 77.8. Despite of the fact the iPhone XS Max is notably older and notably thicker than the vivo X Fold 3 Pro, it's construction is still a bit lighter. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a brighter screen than Apple iPhone XS Max, because although it has a just a little worse screen density, it also counts with a higher 2200 x 2480 pixels resolution, a larger display and a much brighter screen.
IPhone XS Max has a much greater hardware performance than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and lesser processing cores , it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has much more storage to store more games and applications than Apple iPhone XS Max, because it has 512 GB internal memory capacity.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a way better camera than iPhone XS Max, because it has a back facing camera with a much higher resolution, a way larger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot higher quality photos and videos, a larger aperture to take better low light images and videos and a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a much better battery lifetime than iPhone XS Max, because it has a 79 percent more battery capacity.
IPhone XS Max is not only the best devices of the ones we are comparing, but it's also a lot cheaper, making it very easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.