Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Vivo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2018-09-21 | 2021-09-30 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 999.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | AMOLED |
| 463 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.64 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone XS is a bit better than the vivo X70 Pro, getting a general score of 84.2 against 78.3. The iPhone XS body is just a little thinner and a bit lighter than the vivo X70 Pro, although it was released 3 years before. The iPhone XS counts with a bit better performance than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores and slower, it also counts with a 64 bits CPU.
IPhone XS features a bit more vivid display than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a little higher resolution of 1125 x 2436px and a bit higher pixel quantity per inch of display. Vivo X70 Pro features a better camera than Apple iPhone XS, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition and the same video frame rate, the vivo X70 Pro also has a much larger back camera sensor which provides a much better image and video quality, a way more mega pixels back facing camera and a larger camera aperture.
Vivo X70 Pro has a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Apple iPhone XS, because it has more internal storage capacity. The vivo X70 Pro counts with a superior battery duration than iPhone XS, because it has a 67 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.