Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2018-09-21 | 2020-11-27 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.39 x 3.04 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Cool blue, Power black and Yellow |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 999.00 | $ 149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 463 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.64 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Apple iPhone XS is a little bit better than Xiaomi Poco M3, having a general score of 84.2 against 78.2. Despite of the fact that the Apple iPhone XS is a lot older than the Xiaomi Poco M3, it's construction is lighter and a lot thinner. IPhone XS has a more vivid display than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a slightly better 1125 x 2436 resolution and a little better pixels number in each inch in the display.
Xiaomi Poco M3 features a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Apple iPhone XS, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Xiaomi Poco M3 also has a SD extension slot that supports up to 512 GB. The Apple iPhone XS has a better CPU than Xiaomi Poco M3, because although it has an inferior number of cores , and they both have a 4 GB RAM, the Apple iPhone XS also counts with a 64 bits processor.
The Xiaomi Poco M3 shoots a little bit better photos and videos than Apple iPhone XS, because although it has lower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same diafragm aperture and the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the Xiaomi Poco M3 also counts with a way larger sensor and a much more megapixels back camera.
The Xiaomi Poco M3 has a really longer battery life than iPhone XS, because it has a 126 percent more battery capacity.
Although Apple iPhone XS is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Xiaomi Poco M3, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Xiaomi Poco M3. So if you want that extra features, you can buy Apple iPhone XS, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Xiaomi Poco M3, letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.