Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 84.2 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2018-09-21 | 2020-02-11 |
| 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.24 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Gold, Silver and Space gray | Atlantis blue, Matrix purple and Phoenix red |
| Glass and Stainless steel | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 999.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2436 x 1125 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 463 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 625 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730G SM7150-AB chipset |
| 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Apple 4-core GPU GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 10.26 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2659mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.64 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS has a score of 84.2, which is just a bit better than the Xiaomi Poco X2's general score of 79.3. Despite of the fact that the iPhone XS is older than Xiaomi Poco X2, it's design is somewhat lighter and thinner. IPhone XS has a much better looking display than Xiaomi Poco X2, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1125 x 2436 and a little bit better screen pixel density.
The Xiaomi Poco X2's memory to install applications and games is very similar to the Apple iPhone XS one, they have the same internal memory. Apple iPhone XS counts with a quite superior hardware performance than Xiaomi Poco X2, because although it has 2 GB less RAM memory and a lower number of cores (but faster), it also counts with a 64-bits processor.
The Xiaomi Poco X2 counts with a better camera than Apple iPhone XS, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for low light photography and videos and lower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Xiaomi Poco X2 also counts with a back-facing camera with much more mega pixels and a much larger sensor shooting way higher quality videos and photographs.
Xiaomi Poco X2 features a really longer battery lifetime than iPhone XS, because it has a 69 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.