Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.7 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | Apple |
| HarmonyOS 2 | -- |
| -- | 2017-09-22 |
| 6.24 x 2.85 x 0.35 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.63 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black, Silver and White | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.5 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 2376 x 1080 pixels | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| OLED | IPS LCD |
| 402 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Kirin 990E (7 nm) chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Mali-G76 MP14 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 6.3 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 64.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.68 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4200mAh Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.08 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Apple iPhone 8 is better than Mate 40E 4G, with a overall score of 85 against 73.7. Apple iPhone 8's design is thinner and noticeably lighter than the Mate 40E 4G. Apple iPhone 8 has a really superior processing power than Mate 40E 4G, because although it has 2 lesser cores (although faster) and 6 GB less RAM, it also counts with a 64-bit processor.
The Apple iPhone 8 has a little sharper display than Apple Mate 40E 4G, although it has a way worse 750 x 1334 resolution, a quite worse pixel density and a lot smaller display. Apple iPhone 8 has a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Apple Mate 40E 4G, because it has more internal memory.
Apple iPhone 8 counts with a slightly better camera than Mate 40E 4G, because although it has a lot worse resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to take better captures and videos in low-light environments. Mate 40E 4G has a very superior battery duration than iPhone 8, because it has a 4200mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.