Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 48.3 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Archos | LG |
| Windows Phone 8.1 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-05-10 |
| 4.96 x 2.52 x 0.41 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.44 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black, Blue and Yellow | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | OLED |
| 233 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 8212 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 302 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 4.82 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 640 x 480 (VGA) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 5.94 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1950mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 208 hours standby time 9.3 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.84 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is much better than the ARCHOS 40 Cesium, having a general score of 83.7 against 48.3. LG V50 ThinQ is a a lot heavier but somewhat thinner phone than ARCHOS 40 Cesium. LG V50 ThinQ works with Android 10 operating system, and ARCHOS 40 Cesium comes with Windows Phone 8.1 operating system.
LG V50 ThinQ features a better display than ARCHOS 40 Cesium, because it has a lot bigger display, a lot greater display pixels density and a much higher resolution of 1440 x 3120px. The LG V50 ThinQ has a faster processor than ARCHOS 40 Cesium, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor, it also counts with 4 more CPU cores and 5,5 GB more RAM.
LG V50 ThinQ features a way bigger memory to install games and applications than ARCHOS 40 Cesium, because it has more internal memory capacity and a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The LG V50 ThinQ features a lot better camera than ARCHOS 40 Cesium, because it has a way more MP camera and a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a very superior battery duration than ARCHOS 40 Cesium, because it has a 105 percent more battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, LG V50 ThinQ is also cheaper than the ARCHOS 40 Cesium.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.