Compare phones
Motorola DROID Turbo
32 GB Metalized Fiber| Global Score | |
| 45.8 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Archos | Motorola |
| Android 4.2.2 | Android 4.4.4 |
| -- | 2014-10-28 |
| 4.92 x 2.56 x 0.33 inches | 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.42 inches |
| 4.37 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| -- | Gray and Red |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 233 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.7 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6572 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Dual-Core 1300 MHz) processor | Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| ARM Mali-400 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU |
| 8.19 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 0 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 5.94 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1500mAh Battery | 3900mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 150 hours standby time 12 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.28 | 5.84 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola DROID Turbo is way better than ARCHOS 40 Titanium, with a overall score of 76.4 against 45.8. Both devices in our current comparison come with Android OS, but Motorola DROID Turbo has a more recent 4.4.4 version while ARCHOS 40 Titanium has Android 4.2.2, so it gives you a lot of extra features. Even being the best phone in this review, the Motorola DROID Turbo is a much heavier and noticeably thicker phone than ARCHOS 40 Titanium.
Motorola DROID Turbo has a much more vibrant screen than ARCHOS 40 Titanium, because it has a way greater amount of pixels per display inch, a much better 2560 x 1440 resolution and a larger screen. The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with much more storage capacity for games and applications than ARCHOS 40 Titanium, although it has no slot for an external memory card.
The Motorola DROID Turbo has a better performing processing unit than ARCHOS 40 Titanium, and although they both have a 500 MHz graphics processing unit, the Motorola DROID Turbo also has more RAM and more CPU cores. Motorola DROID Turbo captures a lot better photographs and videos than ARCHOS 40 Titanium, because it has a much higher 20.7 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera and a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video definition.
Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a way better battery life than ARCHOS 40 Titanium, because it has a 3900mAh battery capacity against 1500mAh.
Motorola DROID Turbo costs a little more money than ARCHOS 40 Titanium, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.