Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 49.8 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Archos | LG |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.31 x 2.64 x 0.38 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.94 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 480 x 854 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 218 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53 (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 305 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.28 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 4.26 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 5.83 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1850mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 3.76 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is much better than the ARCHOS 45b Helium 4G, with an 83.7 score against 49.8. The LG V50 ThinQ construction is thinner but incredibly heavier than ARCHOS 45b Helium 4G. Both phones in this comparison review work with Android operating system, but LG V50 ThinQ has an older 10 version and ARCHOS 45b Helium 4G has Android 4.4.4.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a better hardware performance than ARCHOS 45b Helium 4G, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processing unit, it also counts with a larger amount of RAM memory and more cpu cores. The LG V50 ThinQ has a more vivid screen than ARCHOS 45b Helium 4G, because it has a way higher 1440 x 3120 resolution, a way higher amount of pixels per inch in the screen and a really bigger display.
The LG V50 ThinQ shoots much better photos and videos than ARCHOS 45b Helium 4G, because it has a lot more MP back-facing camera and a much better 3840x2160 video resolution. LG V50 ThinQ features a very superior memory capacity for applications and games than ARCHOS 45b Helium 4G, because it has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a very superior battery lifetime than ARCHOS 45b Helium 4G, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 1850mAh.
LG V50 ThinQ is not only the best devices in our current comparison, but it's also the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.