Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 60.6 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Archos | LG |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 0000-00-00 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.75 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.01 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and Yellow | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 441 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 615 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A53 (Quad-Core 1500 MHz + Quad-Core 1000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 405 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 6.72 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2700mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.64 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ has a score of 83.7, which is a lot better than the Archos 50 Diamond's global score of 60.6. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but LG V50 ThinQ has the previous 10 version and Archos 50 Diamond has Android 4.4.4 version. Although it's the best phone we are comparing here, LG V50 ThinQ's construction is just a bit thicker and incredibly heavier than Archos 50 Diamond.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with just a little better hardware performance than Archos 50 Diamond, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor and a 32-bit processing unit instead of 64-bits, and they both have 8 cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also counts with a larger amount of RAM memory.
Archos 50 Diamond counts with a little bit better screen than LG V50 ThinQ, although it has a little bit lower display density, a lot lower 1920 x 1080px resolution and a way smaller screen. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much greater storage to store more apps and games than Archos 50 Diamond, because it has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal memory.
LG V50 ThinQ features a superior battery life than Archos 50 Diamond, because it has a 4000mAh battery size. LG V50 ThinQ takes much better pictures and videos than Archos 50 Diamond, because although it has a back-facing camera with a way lower 12 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 video definition.
Even being the best phone in our current comparison, LG V50 ThinQ is also cheaper than the other phone, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.