Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 51.3 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Archos | LG |
| Android 5.1 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 0000-00-00 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.63 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.68 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and White | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Mediatek MT6735P chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-T720 MP2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 7.47 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.06 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 6.93 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 3.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ has a general score of 83.7, which is much better than ARCHOS 50 Helium Plus's 51.3 general score. LG V50 ThinQ is a somewhat heavier but thinner phone than ARCHOS 50 Helium Plus. Both phones in our current comparison include Android OS, but the LG V50 ThinQ has the newer 10 version while ARCHOS 50 Helium Plus has Android 5.1, providing you some extra features.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a bit more vivid display than ARCHOS 50 Helium Plus, because it has a way higher 1440 x 3120 pixels resolution, a way better count of pixels per inch of screen and a larger screen. LG V50 ThinQ has a lot better performance than ARCHOS 50 Helium Plus, because it has a larger amount of RAM and more cores.
The LG V50 ThinQ has much more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than ARCHOS 50 Helium Plus, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG V50 ThinQ takes much better photographs and videos than ARCHOS 50 Helium Plus, because although it has a back facing camera with a lower 12 MP resolution, it also counts with a lot better video resolution.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a very superior battery lifetime than ARCHOS 50 Helium Plus, because it has a 100 percent greater battery capacity.
The LG V50 ThinQ is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also the cheapest one, which makes this phone an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.