Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 52.4 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Archos | LG |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.71 x 2.81 x 0.35 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 6.46 ounces |
| Black | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 294 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53 (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 306 (450 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.06 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 6.38 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2000mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 3.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is way better than ARCHOS 50b Helium 4G, getting a global score of 83.7 against 52.4. Both devices in this comparison have Android OS (Operating System), but the LG V50 ThinQ has 10 version while ARCHOS 50b Helium 4G has Android 4.4.4 version. The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a better hardware performance than ARCHOS 50b Helium 4G, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processor, it also counts with a higher number of cores and a greater amount of RAM memory.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a little bit better screen than ARCHOS 50b Helium 4G, because it has a lot better pixels number per inch of screen, a bigger screen and a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3120 pixels. The LG V50 ThinQ features a way bigger storage for games and applications than ARCHOS 50b Helium 4G, because it has a SD extension slot that admits up to 1,95 TB and more internal memory capacity.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a lot better camera than ARCHOS 50b Helium 4G, because it has a lot better 3840x2160 video definition and a lot better resolution back facing camera. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a really longer battery life than ARCHOS 50b Helium 4G, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 2000mAh.
In addition to being the best phone in our comparison, LG V50 ThinQ is also cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.