Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 53.8 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Archos | LG |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.75 x 2.89 x 0.36 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| -- | 6.46 ounces |
| Black | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 480 x 854 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 196 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT6732 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| 64-bit ARM Cortex-A53 (Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali-T760 MP2 (Dual-Core 416 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.06 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 5.94 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2500mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 4.48 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is a lot better than ARCHOS 50c Helium 4G, with an 83.7 score against 53.8. These devices work with Android OS (operating system), but LG V50 ThinQ has the older 10 version while ARCHOS 50c Helium 4G has Android 4.4.4. LG V50 ThinQ features a little faster CPU than ARCHOS 50c Helium 4G, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics processor and a 32-bit processing unit against 64-bits, it also counts with more cpu cores and 5 GB more RAM memory.
LG V50 ThinQ features a sharper screen than ARCHOS 50c Helium 4G, because it has a lot more pixels per inch in the screen, a larger screen and a lot better resolution of 1440 x 3120. LG V50 ThinQ has a much bigger storage capacity for games and applications than ARCHOS 50c Helium 4G, because it has a SD memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB and 120 GB more internal storage capacity.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a much better battery lifetime than ARCHOS 50c Helium 4G, because it has a 60% larger battery capacity. The LG V50 ThinQ shoots greater photos and videos than ARCHOS 50c Helium 4G, because it has a way better 12 MP resolution back-facing camera and a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we compare here, LG V50 ThinQ is also cheap compared to the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.