Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 62.9 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Archos | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10 |
| 2016-02-18 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.23 x 3.26 x 0.34 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| -- | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 279.00 | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 490 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3610mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 is much better than the ARCHOS Diamond 2 Note, getting an 85.5 score against 62.9. Although the Samsung Galaxy A51 is somewhat heavier than ARCHOS Diamond 2 Note, it's just a bit thinner and incredibly newer. Both phones in this comparison have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A51 has an older 11 version while ARCHOS Diamond 2 Note has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version.
Galaxy A51 has a little faster CPU than ARCHOS Diamond 2 Note, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Galaxy A51 also has a higher amount of RAM. ARCHOS Diamond 2 Note has a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy A51, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little greater screen pixel density and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A51 counts with a much better camera than ARCHOS Diamond 2 Note, and although they both have the same video frame rates, a same size camera aperture and the same (4K) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A51 also has a back camera with a lot better 48 mega pixels resolution. Galaxy A51 has much more storage to store more games and applications than ARCHOS Diamond 2 Note, because it has a SD card slot that allows up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal memory.
Galaxy A51 features a little better battery duration than ARCHOS Diamond 2 Note, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3610mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 is a bit more expensive than the ARCHOS Diamond 2 Note, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.