Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 62.9 | 88.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Archos | Samsung |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2016-02-18 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.23 x 3.26 x 0.34 inches | 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| -- | Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 279.00 | $ 281.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3040 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 490 pixels per inch | 551 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3610mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.6 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 is way better than ARCHOS Diamond 2 Note, with a global score of 88.3 against 62.9. Samsung Galaxy S10's body is a lot newer and a bit thinner, but just a little bit heavier than ARCHOS Diamond 2 Note. These phones come with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S10 has 11 version while ARCHOS Diamond 2 Note has Android 6.0 Marshmallow.
Samsung Galaxy S10 has just a bit better display than ARCHOS Diamond 2 Note, because it has a little bit larger screen, a little bit higher 1440 x 3040 resolution and a little better pixels count per inch in the screen. The Samsung Galaxy S10 counts with a bit better performance than ARCHOS Diamond 2 Note, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10 also has 5 GB more RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 has a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than ARCHOS Diamond 2 Note, because it has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 512 GB and more internal storage. ARCHOS Diamond 2 Note counts with a little longer battery life than Galaxy S10, because it has 3610mAh of battery capacity instead of 3400mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 shoots just a bit better photos and videos than ARCHOS Diamond 2 Note, because although it has a back facing camera with way less megapixels and a lower 3840x2160 video quality, it also counts with a lot larger camera aperture for better low-light photography and video.
The Galaxy S10 costs a little more than ARCHOS Diamond 2 Note, but you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.