Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 62.9 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Archos | Xiaomi |
| Android 6.0 Marshmallow | Android 10 |
| 2016-02-18 | 2020-05-05 |
| 6.23 x 3.26 x 0.34 inches | 6.53 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| -- | Glacier white, Interstellar gray and Tropical green |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 279.00 | $ 291.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 490 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Helio X10 MT6795 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G SM7125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 465, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| PowerVR G6200 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 8.12 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3610mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5020mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.6 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is a lot better than the ARCHOS Diamond 2 Note, having an 81.1 score against 62.9. Both of these phones come with Android OS (operating system), but the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro has 10 version while ARCHOS Diamond 2 Note has Android 6.0 Marshmallow version. Although the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro is way newer than the ARCHOS Diamond 2 Note, it is much heavier and a little thicker.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro features a little better performance than ARCHOS Diamond 2 Note, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has 3 GB more RAM memory. ARCHOS Diamond 2 Note has just a bit better looking display than Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little higher pixel density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a much better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than ARCHOS Diamond 2 Note, because it has a SD memory slot that admits up to 512 GB and more internal storage capacity. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro takes greater videos and photos than ARCHOS Diamond 2 Note, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro also has a back camera with a way better 64 MP resolution and a bigger aperture.
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro counts with a much better battery life than ARCHOS Diamond 2 Note, because it has 5020mAh of battery capacity.
Xiaomi Redmi Note 9 Pro costs a little more money than the ARCHOS Diamond 2 Note, but you can get a much better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.