Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 38.9 | 42.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Nokia |
| Windows Mobile Professional 6.0 | -- |
| -- | 2010-09-15 |
| 4.44 x 2.28 x 0.68 inches | 4.37 x 1.87 x 0.43 inches |
| 4.58 ounces | 3.53 ounces |
| -- | Gray and Yellow |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1905.00 | $ 399.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 2.6 inches | 2.4 inches |
| 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) | 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) |
| TFT | TFT |
| 154 pixels per inch | 167 pixels per inch |
| Resistive | Resistive |
| 5.9 | 6.1 |
| Marvell PXA270 (Single-Core 520 MHz) processor | Single-Core 800 MHz processor |
| 64 MB RAM | 64 MB RAM |
| GPU | ARM Mali-400 MP1 (320 MHz) GPU |
| 6.57 | 7.2 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 30,72 MB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 0 | 1.72 |
| Camera | |
| 3.00 MP | 5.00 MP |
| -- | 640 x 480 (15 fps) (VGA) video resolution |
| -- | 320 x 240 (20 fps) (QVGA) slow motion video |
| 5.06 | 5.94 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 3.3 | 3.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1300mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1050mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 300 hours standby time 6 hours talk time | 408 hours standby time 5.6 hours talk time |
| 3.04 | 2.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0, EDR | Bluetooth 2.1, EDR |
| GPS | -- |
| -- | Accelerometer |
Comparison review
Nokia C3 Touch and Type has a general score of 42.7, which is a little bit better than Asus P750's 38.9 general score. Nokia C3 Touch and Type is a much thinner and a lot lighter phone than the Asus P750. The Nokia C3 Touch and Type features a little sharper screen than Asus P750, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have exactly the same 320 x 240 resolution, the Nokia C3 Touch and Type also counts with a just a bit greater pixel count in each inch in the screen.
The Nokia C3 Touch and Type has a little faster processing unit than Asus P750, and although they both have 1 cpu cores and the same RAM memory amount, the Nokia C3 Touch and Type also has an extra graphics processor. Nokia C3 Touch and Type counts with a much better storage for games and applications than Asus P750.
Asus P750 features improved battery duration than Nokia C3 Touch and Type, because it has a 24% bigger battery capacity. The Nokia C3 Touch and Type takes much better videos and photos than Asus P750, because it has a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
The Nokia C3 Touch and Type is not only the best devices in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest, which makes it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.