Compare phones
Asus PadFone
32 GB| Global Score | |
| 59.3 | 65.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | HTC |
| Android 4.0.3 | Android 4.2.2, 4.1, 4.0.4, 4.0.3 |
| 2011-06-01 | 2012-02-26 |
| 5.04 x 2.57 x 0.36 inches | 5.29 x 2.75 x 0.35 inches |
| 4.55 ounces | 4.59 ounces |
| -- | Black, Gray and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 600.00 | $ 125.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) |
| Super AMOLED | S-LCD 2 |
| 256 pixels per inch | 312 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.4 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8260A chipset | NVIDIA Tegra 3 T30 chipset |
| Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A9 (Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 1 GB RAM |
| Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | ULP GeForce (520 MHz) GPU |
| 8.37 | 8.64 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.12 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 8.00 MP + 1.30 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (23 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 8.36 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| SIM | Micro SIM |
| 4 | 4.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1520mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1800mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 373 hours standby time 10.8 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.28 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
HTC One X is a bit better than Asus PadFone, with a 65.2 score against 59.3. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but the HTC One X has a newer 4.2.2 version while Asus PadFone has Android 4.0.3, providing the user a couple nice extra features and performance enhancements. The HTC One X construction is newer and just a little thinner than Asus PadFone's, but it's also a bit heavier.
HTC One X features a bit better hardware performance than Asus PadFone, and although they both have the same RAM amount, the HTC One X also has a greater number of 1500 MHz cores and a better GPU. HTC One X has a better display than Asus PadFone, because it has a higher 1280 x 720 resolution, a little greater pixel count in each display inch and a little bit larger screen.
The HTC One X captures a little bit better pictures and videos than Asus PadFone, because although it has worse video frame rates, and they both have the same (Full HD) video resolution and a 8 mega-pixels back-facing camera, the HTC One X also counts with a bigger camera aperture to capture better photography and videos in low light environments.
The Asus PadFone has a superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC One X, and although they both have equal 32 GB internal storage capacity, the Asus PadFone also has an external memory slot that supports up to 32 GB. HTC One X counts with greater battery life than Asus PadFone, because it has 1800mAh of battery capacity instead of 1520mAh.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the HTC One X is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.