Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 79.8 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-09-19 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.81 x 3.03 x 0.41 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.43 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Space Gray | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2448 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 9000+ (4 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G710 MC10 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 12.43 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 7.52 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition is a little bit better than Asus ROG Phone 6D, getting a overall score of 80.4 against 79.8. Despite of the fact that Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition is incredibly older than the Asus ROG Phone 6D, it's design is notably lighter and notably thinner. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition has a much more powerful CPU than Asus ROG Phone 6D, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Asus ROG Phone 6D features a bit sharper screen than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a little lower 1080 x 2448 pixels resolution and a just a little lower pixel density, it also counts with a larger display. Asus ROG Phone 6D captures greater photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a back-facing camera with much more mega pixels, a way larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution.
The Asus ROG Phone 6D counts with a much bigger storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal storage. The Asus ROG Phone 6D features a very superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.