Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.2 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| Android 12 | -- |
| 2022-09-19 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.81 x 3.03 x 0.41 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 8.43 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Space Gray | -- |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2448 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1200 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 9000+ (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 16 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G710 MC10 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 6.3 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 17.6 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 12.43 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.3 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 has a global score of 90.7, which is slightly better than the Asus ROG Phone 6D Ultimate's 83.2 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy A52 design is notably lighter and somewhat thinner than Asus ROG Phone 6D Ultimate, although it was released about a year before. The Galaxy A52 counts with a much greater hardware performance than Asus ROG Phone 6D Ultimate, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Asus ROG Phone 6D Ultimate has a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A52, because although it has a little inferior quantity of pixels per inch of screen, it also counts with a slightly better 1080 x 2448 resolution and a quite larger screen. Asus ROG Phone 6D Ultimate features more memory for applications and games than Galaxy A52, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Asus ROG Phone 6D Ultimate shoots clearer videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has a camera with a much worse resolution and a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for low light photos and video, it also counts with a larger back camera sensor and a much higher video definition.
Asus ROG Phone 6D Ultimate features superior battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A52, because it has a 33 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.