Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Vivo |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-09-04 | 2024-04-03 |
| 6.73 x 3.06 x 0.37 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 8.47 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black Glare | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| -- | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 390 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| 600 cd/m2 brightness | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Plus SM8150-AC chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.81 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 512 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 17.6 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 24.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6000mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 7.52 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Asus ROG Phone II is better than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, having an 88 score against 77.8. Although it's the best in this comparison review, it must be noted that it is also incredibly older, incredibly thicker and just a little bit heavier. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro counts with a much sharper screen than Asus ROG Phone II, because it has way more brightness, a larger display, a quite better pixels quantity in each display inch and a lot better resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels.
The Asus ROG Phone II has a much more powerful CPU than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. The vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a bit better camera than Asus ROG Phone II, because it has a much better video quality, a lot bigger back camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a larger aperture for better captures and video in low-light environments and a back-facing camera with more mega pixels.
Asus ROG Phone II and vivo X Fold 3 Pro have really similar memory capacity to install applications and games, both have the same internal storage. The Asus ROG Phone II counts with just a little bit longer battery life than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity instead of 5700mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.