Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Nokia |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | -- |
| 2018-05-03 | 2019-03-03 |
| 6.26 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | 6.10 x 2.95 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black and Silver | Blue |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 699.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | P-OLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.35 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3320mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Nokia 9 PureView has a score of 76.4, which is just a bit better than the Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1)'s overall score of 73.1. Nokia 9 PureView's construction is newer, a bit thinner and just a bit lighter than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1). Nokia 9 PureView has just a little better processing power than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1), and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Nokia 9 PureView also has a higher amount of RAM.
The Nokia 9 PureView has a little sharper screen than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1), and although they both have a same size screen, the Nokia 9 PureView also has a higher pixel density and a higher 1440 x 2880px resolution. The Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1) counts with a lot bigger storage to install applications and games than Nokia 9 PureView, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1) features a way better battery duration than Nokia 9 PureView, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 3320mAh. Nokia 9 PureView counts with just a bit better camera than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1), because although it has a lower (4K) video resolution and a worse 12 MP resolution camera, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture to capture better low light photos.
Although Nokia 9 PureView is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1), and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1). If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can buy Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1), letting go some specs and features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.