Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 73.1 | 82.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2018-05-03 | -- |
| 6.26 x 2.99 x 0.33 inches | -- |
| 6.35 ounces | -- |
| Black and Silver | -- |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2160 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 402 pixels per inch | 416 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | 2600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 509 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.91 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 25.00mm focal length | 24.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.35 | 12.54 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S25 has a general score of 82.6, which is better than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1)'s 73.1 score. Samsung Galaxy S25's body is notably lighter and way thinner than the Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1). These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S25 has 14 version and Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1) has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1) features a much greater hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S25, although it has 4 GB less RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy S25 counts with a more vivid screen than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1), because it has a way brighter screen, a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, a quite bigger display and a bit more pixels per inch of display.
Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1) features a way bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S25, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1) has longer battery performance than Galaxy S25, because it has a 25 percent larger battery capacity.
Galaxy S25 shoots way better photographs and videos than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1), because it has a back facing camera with lot more MP, a larger aperture for better low-light images and videos and a way higher 7680x4320 video quality.
Although Samsung Galaxy S25 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1), and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1). If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get the Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M1), and give up a few specs and features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.