Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.4 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2018-12-11 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.22 x 2.97 x 0.33 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.17 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| 16 777 216 | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.3 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2280 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| 450 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.4 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 512 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.06 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.57 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a global score of 98.9, which is a lot better than the Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2)'s global score of 77.4. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra construction is newer and a little thinner, but heavier than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2). Both phones in this comparison have Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has the older 13 version and Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2) has Android 9.0 Pie.
Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a bit better performance than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra features a little sharper display than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2), because it has a little higher display pixel density, a higher 1440 x 3088 resolution and a quite larger display.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra shoots greater photographs and videos than Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2), and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a lot more mega pixels camera, a way better 7680x4320 video quality and a much larger sensor. Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2) counts with a quite bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2) also has an external memory slot that allows up to 1,95 TB.
Asus ZenFone Max Pro (M2) has a bit superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.