Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 5.1 |
| 2022-05-09 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 12.95 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black, Green and Orange | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| -- | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| IPS LCD | Super AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 480 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.5 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6781 (7 nm) chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.4 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8380mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 9.2 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 5 has a global score of 79.3, which is better than Blackview BL8800 Pro's 71.9 overall score. The Galaxy Note 5 is an notably older cellphone than Blackview BL8800 Pro, but it's way thinner and incredibly lighter anyway. Both of these phones include Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Note 5 has an older 5.1 version and Blackview BL8800 Pro has Android 11.
Blackview BL8800 Pro counts with just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a higher number of cores (and also faster) and a greater amount of RAM memory. Galaxy Note 5 counts with a better looking display than Blackview BL8800 Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a greater number of pixels per screen inch.
Samsung Galaxy Note 5 captures clearer pictures and videos than Blackview BL8800 Pro, although it has a back facing camera with a lot lower resolution and a tinier aperture which is worse for low light captures and videos. Blackview BL8800 Pro counts with a much bigger storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has 128 GB internal storage.
Blackview BL8800 Pro counts with a very superior battery duration than Galaxy Note 5, because it has an 8380mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.