Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2022-05-09 | 2019-03-08 |
| 6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 inches | 5.60 x 2.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 12.95 ounces | 5.29 ounces |
| Black, Green and Orange | Canary yellow, Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green, Prism silver and Prism white |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 408.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 400 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| 480 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.5 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6781 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.46 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8380mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 3100mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 9.2 | 5.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10e has a general score of 86.3, which is a lot better than Blackview BL8800 Pro's global score of 71.9. Galaxy S10e is an notably older phone than Blackview BL8800 Pro, but Samsung was able to make it notably lighter and incredibly thinner anyway. The Galaxy S10e has a little bit better performance than Blackview BL8800 Pro, although it has 2 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
Blackview BL8800 Pro counts with a slightly better looking display than Galaxy S10e, because although it has a just a bit lower quantity of pixels per inch in the screen, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2408 and a bit larger screen. Galaxy S10e takes just a bit better photographs and videos than Blackview BL8800 Pro, because although it has a camera with much less mega-pixels, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to take better captures in low-light situations.
Samsung Galaxy S10e features a much better storage for apps and games than Blackview BL8800 Pro, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy S10e also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Blackview BL8800 Pro has a much better battery duration than Galaxy S10e, because it has a 170 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.