Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 71.9 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | |
| Android 11 | Android 5.0 |
| 2022-05-09 | 2015-03-01 |
| 6.94 x 3.29 x 0.70 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 12.95 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Black, Green and Orange | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| -- | Aluminium |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.6 inches | 5 inches |
| 2408 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| IPS LCD | S-LCD 3 |
| 400 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| 480 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.5 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6781 (7 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC2 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 27.80mm focal length |
| -- | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.46 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8380mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 9.2 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
HTC One M9 is a little bit better than the Blackview BL8800, having a 77.7 score against 71.9. These phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the HTC One M9 has the older 5.0 version while Blackview BL8800 has Android 11. HTC One M9's body is a lot lighter and much thinner than Blackview BL8800, despite of the fact that it was released 7 years before.
HTC One M9 features just a bit better screen than Blackview BL8800, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1920 x 1080px and a lot smaller display, it also counts with a little more pixels per inch of screen. HTC One M9 counts with a bit better performance than Blackview BL8800, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have 8 cpu cores, the HTC One M9 also counts with an extra GPU and a 64-bits processor.
The HTC One M9 counts with a little bit better camera than Blackview BL8800, although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for taking images or video in low light situations and a back camera with way less megapixels resolution. Blackview BL8800 has a lot bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC One M9, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
The Blackview BL8800 features a really longer battery performance than HTC One M9, because it has 8380mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.